The Volpe team started by looking at the daily VMT for all scenarios. This is done by combining seven DVMT outputs by location and type of mode. Percent change is calculated relative to the base scenario value.
Across the study area, the largest DVMT changes in 2045 were observed for scenario K2 - Increasing Telecommuting, using the ‘relative employment’ input file in VisionEval to represent telecommuting. Interestingly, increases in DVMT were observed for the ‘smaller familes’ scenario. Increases in DVMT were observed for the higher population growth scenario, which is as expected.
As with the DVMT values, just looking at energy usage for heavy trucks, the largest decrease was for scenario K2 - Increasing Telecommuting. This is worth noting because we would not necessarily expect heavy truck trips to be altered so much by telecommuting, so this deserves more investigation. Increases in heavy truck energy use were observed for the ‘L3 - Smaller Families’ scenario, which is not necessarily expected.
In addition to examining the outputs which are reported at the entire metropolitan area level, we also investigated the outputs rolled up across all households.
Again, scenario K2 - Increasing telecommuting had by far the biggest reduction in electricity use.
The largest changes in emissions, summed up from the household CO[2]e values, was under the scenario with increasing electrification (2 different levels of increase tested), with the very substantial reductions as well observed under the K2 - increasing telecommuting scenario.
The Volpe team also realized the need to validate the VisionEval output.
The VDOT team sent along daily VMT values in 2021 and 2045 from the MWCOG MOE Base model. These results include household car VMT, business car VMT, and car travel from other locations (such as motorists who live outside the area and are passing through it.
Here are the raw results from the MWCOG base model in 2045:
| Jurisdiction | Freeway | Expressway | Major Art. | Minor Art. | Collector | Ramp | All |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fairfax County | 12,517,806 | 5,910,760 | 6,219,736 | 1,419,677 | 1,256,563 | 488,882 | 27,813,424 |
| City of Fairfax | 0 | 284,867 | 99,406 | 9,144 | 0 | 0 | 393,417 |
| Falls Church | 0 | 106,172 | 40,693 | 4,605 | 0 | 0 | 151,470 |
CROSSTAB ROW=FLAG COL=FTYPE VAR=_24VMTTRK
| Jurisdiction | Freeway | Expressway | Major Art. | Minor Art. | Collector | Ramp | All |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fairfax County | 3,071,425 | 988,206 | 919,784 | 212,966 | 331,425 | 90,603 | 5,614,408 |
| City of Fairfax | 0 | 37,640 | 12,957 | 774 | 0 | 0 | 51,371 |
| Falls Church | 0 | 18,944 | 5,575 | 425 | 0 | 0 | 24,944 |
When you add all of the numbers up, you get 34,049,034 daily VMTs. This is about 4,000,000 higher than the VisionEval dvmt values. The chart below shows the percent differences with each of our scenarios.
Here is a table showing some of the validation steps taken:
| File from the Travel Demand Model | Value | Output from NOVA model | Output from VisionEval (Base Model) | Percent Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019i4_Trip_Generation_Summary.txt | HH DVMT | 34,049,034 | 30,040,347 | 5-15% |
| 2019i4_Trip_Generation_Summary.txt | Truck DVMT | 5,690,723 | 1,206,452 | 70-80% |